|
|
Do These Symptoms Sound Familiar?By George Ramos Jr.
You may be experiencing the magnification of workplace substance abuse. The longer these issues go uninvestigated and uncorrected, the more costly and time-consuming it is to get your workplace in order. You cant afford to ignore this liability. Small Businesses Are Most Vulnerable When it comes to workplace substance abuse, small businesses have major disadvantages. They are less likely to have programs in place to combat the problem, yet they are more likely to be the employer-of-choice for illicit drug users. Employees who are unable to adhere to a drug-free workplace policy seek employment at companies that dont perform pre-employment drug testing (or dont have policies in place). The cost of one error caused by an impairedand/or under-the-influence employee can seriously devastate a small company. Among the population of full-time employed current illicit drug users:
No business, regardless of size or location, is immune to the countless problems that substance abuse can cause. Most individuals who abuse alcohol, prescription medication, and illicit drugs are employed; and when they arrive for work, they dont leave their problems at the doorstep of their employers business.
You Bear the Brunt of the Problem Everyone involved in owning and operating a business pays for workplace alcohol and drug abuse. Some costs are obvious, such as higher insurance premiums, increased absences, accidents and errors. Others, such as low morale and high illness rates, are less apparent, but the effects are equally harmful both economically and to the reputation of the organization.
Substance Abuse and Drug-Testing Policies Drug-testing policies protect both employees and employers. It is important for employers to note that drug testing without a drug-testing policyeven if an employee is suspected of having substance abuse problemexposes them to a number of significant liability and legal vulnerabilities. A written substance abuse (drug-free workplace) policy is the foundation of a comprehensive drug-free workplace program. Every employers written policy should be unique and tailored to meet its specific needs; however, all effective policies have a few aspects in common.
Employers should also note that sharing their policy with all employees is essential, and many businesses find it helpful to ask for feedback from employees during the initial policy development stage. Workplace Drug Testing Under the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 , some Federal contractors and all Federal grantees must agree to provide drug-free workplaces as a condition of receiving a contract or grant. Under most circumstances, employers have the right to test prospective and current employees for a wide variety of substances. However, it is important that employers familiarize themselves with the various state and federal laws that may apply to their type of business before designing and implementing substance abuse and drug-testing policies. The majority of employers across the US are not required by law to test, and some state and county governments have statutes that limit or prohibit workplace testing. Employers should make appropriate use of drug testing, and make sure that their policies and procedures are in compliance with state and federal laws. The best way to ensure this is to retain a qualified and competent background screening and drug test provider. About the Author:
|
Industry Statistics
Background Screening
Upcoming Events |
- about us
- service solutions
- Employment Screening
- Tenant Screening
- Vendor Screening
- Nanny Screening
- Civil History Search
- Consumer Credit History Search
- Criminal History Search
- Driver's License Record History
- Education Verification
- Employment Verification
- National Criminal Index Database Search
- Professional Licenses/Credentials Verification
- Sexual Offender Search
- Social Security Number Trace
- Worker's Compensation Records
- Drug Screening
- Premaritial Screening
- resources
- links
- media
- (800) 424-7011





George J. Ramos, Jr. is President of 
